Legal Opinion
Daniel Workman v. Arthur Tate, (Workman I)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1992No. 91-3057, 91-3092PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Arthur Tate (State of Ohio or the state) appeals from an order entered December 6, 1990, in the Northern District of Ohio, Alvin I. Krenzler, District Judge, granting appellee Daniel Workman’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus with respect to his convictions in the Court of Common Pleas for Cuyahoga County, Ohio on charges of felonious assault and having a weapon while under a disability.
The state asserts that the district court erred (1) in addressing the merits of Workman’s petition because he had not exhausted his state remedies; and (2) in applying the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Harold McQueen Jr. v. Gene Scroggy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Richard H. Austin v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Joseph Stewart v. Hugh WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Will Washington v. Charles JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.