Legal Opinion

In re Androgel Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 6, 2014No. MDL No. 2545PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHH G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in 15 Northern District of Illinois actions and plaintiffs in an action (Barrios) pending in the Eastern District of Louisiana move, separately, to centralize this litigation involving injuries arising from the use of testosterone replacement therapies in, respectively, the Northern District of Illinois or the Eastern District of Louisiana. The Eastern District of Louisiana movants alternatively suggest centralization in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. This litigation currently…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Incretin Mimetics Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Fluoroquinolone Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
  2. In re Proton-Pump Inhibitor Products Liability Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
  3. Greene v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  4. In re Daily Fantasy Sports Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016
  5. In re: Salesforce, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation; In re: Trans Union, LLC, Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API