Legal Opinion

In re Incretin Mimetics Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided August 26, 2013No. MDL No. 2452PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in two Southern District of California actions move to centralize this litigation, which involves four anti-diabetic medications that plaintiffs contend cause pancreatic cancer, in the Southern District of • California. This litigation currently consists of 53 actions pending in seven districts, as listed on Schedule A.1

All responding parties support centralization. Plaintiffs in fifteen Southern District of California actions and a District of Arizona action support plaintiffs’ motion in its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Yellow Brass Plumbing Component Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Fluoroquinolone Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
  2. In re Androgel Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  3. Jones v. Novo Nordisk A/SDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024
  4. Jones v. Novo Nordisk A/SDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API