Legal Opinion

In re Daily Fantasy Sports Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 4, 2016No. MDL No. 2677, MDL No. 2678, MDL No. 2679Published

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

Sarah S. Vance, Chair

Before the Panel:* Before the Panel are three dockets involving allegations of *1377improper or illegal conduct by the nation’s two largest operators of online daily fantasy sports contests — DraftKings, Inc. and FanDuel, Inc. (collectively, the DFS Defendants). While the actions in this litigation involve a variety of allegations, these allegations generally fall into one of three categories. First, the “insider trading” actions allege that the DFS Defendants allowed their employees to participate in competitors’ fantasy sports contests using non-public…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency Emissions Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001
  2. In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  3. In Re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  4. In re Androgel Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  5. In Re Adelphia Communications Corp. Securities & Derivative Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API