Legal Opinion
Bannum, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 15, 2009No. 09-546CPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
In this bid protest, Plaintiff Bannum, Inc. (“Bannum”) challenges a contract award by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) to Dismas Charities, Inc. (“Dismas”) for Residential Reentry Center (“RRC”) services in Charleston, West Virginia. An RRC is more commonly known as a halfway house for federal prison inmates as they transition to independent living. Bannum, the incumbent contractor in Charleston, submitted the lowest price for these RRC services. However, in the initial evaluation and reevaluation following a sustained protest by the Government…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Active Network, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Mercom, Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.