Boro Hall Corporation v. General Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The petition for a rehearing as well as the affidavits in answer and reply-are entirely irregular as documents for submission in connection with a motion for rehearing since there is nothing properly before this court except the record on appeal. They may be considered, however, as upon an application for leave to file a petition in the District Court to reopen the case and to remand the cause to that court for further proceedings. Gairing Tool Co. v. Eclipse Interchangeable Counterbore Co., 6 Cir., 1930, 48 F.2d 73, 75. Such an application should be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gairing Tool Co. v. Eclipse Interchangeable Counterbore Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- B. S. Pearsall Butter Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Salco Corporation, Formerly Known and Doing Business as Denver Buick, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation, Buick Motor DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- United States v. San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
- Kaiser v. General Motors Corp.(Pontiac Motor Div.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.