Legal Opinion
In Re Calhoun
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 1949No. 2073PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWiseman, J.
This is an action in habeas corpus, originating in this court, in which the petitioner seeks his release from the Dayton workhouse where he is now confined on two sentences imposed by the Municipal Court of Dayton. The petitioner claims that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty on two grounds:
The petitioner was convicted in the Municipal Court of Dayton in case No. 91457 for assault and in case No. 71415 for assault and battery in violation of ordinance- No. 943-2 of the city of Dayton, which he claims is a void ordinance for the reason that it is in conflict with the general laws of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Youngstown v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Holt v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Cozart v. CarranOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Kistler v. City of WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
- Holub v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- City of Toledo v. KohlhoferOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
- Chapman v. GrahamUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Cincinnati v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. LeeseOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.