Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cozart v. Carran

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1937No. 26558PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

Section 6064-17, General Code, authorizes the state Board of Liquor Control to issue not more than one D-3, D-4 or D-5 permit for each two thousand population or part thereof.

• The ordinance of the city of East Cleveland restricts licenses for permits to one for every thirty-five hundred of population. If the ordinance prevails the relator was not entitled to a writ, while if the statute is controlling it is conceded that he was.

Under the provisions of Article XVIII, Section 3, of the Ohio Constitution, while municipalities have authority “to adopt and enforce within their limits such local…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City of Bellingham v. SchamperaWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. LundquistWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Employco Personnel Services, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API