City of Toledo v. Kohlhofer
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.
This is an appeal by the city of Toledo on questions of law from a judgment of the Municipal Court of Toledo sustaining a demurrer and dismissing an affidavit charging that the defendant “did, at 2 N. Erie Street in the city of Toledo, Ohio, sell, offer for sale and did exhibit a device or article, to wit: a rubber device commonly known as a condom, intended for the prevention of conception, the same being contrary to Section 17-10-8 of the Municiple [sic] Code for the city of Toledo, Ohio.”
Although no provision is made for an appeal from a judgment adverse to a municipality in Chapter 2953…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. CovingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1876
- Harris v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Nosowitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- L. & M. Investment Co. v. CutlerOhio Supreme Court · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BurgunOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. BeckleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Preterm-Cleveland v. Stephanie McCloudCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Sanitary Vendors, Inc. v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- State v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.