Legal Opinion

Kayser Roth Co. v. Holmes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1985No. WD 36213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Judge.

Plaintiff Kayser Roth Corporation is and was at all relevant times a corporation of some state other than Missouri, engaged in the business of clothing manufacture. It had not obtained a certificate of authority to transact business in Missouri pursuant to the requirements of § 351.570.1, RSMo 1978. It brought suit against defendant Don A. Melching upon Melching’s personal guaranty of payment for clothing furnished by Kayser Roth to one E. Michael Holmes, d/b/a Soricelli Men’s Wear. The amount of the account was $22,248.

At the conclusion of the plaintiffs evidence, the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Superior Concrete Accessories, Inc. v. KemperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Executive Jet Management & Pilot Service, Inc. v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Want v. LeveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Atlas Housewrecking & Lumber Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Western Outdoor Advertising Co. of Nebraska v. Berbiglia, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ozark Employment Specialists, Inc. v. BeemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Pemiscot County Memorial Hospital v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Jem Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. KMS, Inc. v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Campaign Works, Ltd. v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API