Legal Opinion

Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Jem Development Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 1987No. 15195PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Judge.

Appellant Berkel & Company Contractors, Inc. (Berkel) filed an action based upon contract and quantum meruit alleging it had performed services under a contract with Respondent JEM Development Corporation (JEM) for which it had not been paid. Following a jury verdict for Berkel, the trial court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of JEM. The basis of the court’s judgment was that Berkel had failed to prove its legal existence as a corporation.

On appeal, the claim is made that the trial court erroneously placed the burden of proof on Berkel to prove its…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stark v. American Bakeries Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Schnucks Twenty-Five, Inc. v. BettendorfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Estate of Huskey v. MonroeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Dockery v. MannisiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Schneider v. Best Truck Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. BOARD OF REGENTS OF SOUTHWEST MO. STATE UNIVERSITY v. HarrimanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Housing Authority of Rolla v. KimmelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Ahrens Contracting, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. KMS, Inc. v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. ALLSTAR CAPITAL, INC. v. WadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API