Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Scudder Kemper Investments, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 24, 2001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.

The plaintiff, Dudley H. Ladd, filed the present action claiming that his former employer, Scudder Kemper Investments, Inc. (Scudder), failed to pay him the full value of his Scudder stock in accordance with the terms of his severance agreement. Scudder moved to stay the proceedings and compel arbitration of Ladd’s claims. Scudder’s motion was denied, whereupon Scudder took a proper interlocutory appeal pursuant to G. L. c. 251, § 18 (a) (1). We transferred the case to this court on our own motion. We affirm the order denying Scudder’s motion to compel arbitration.

Background. Ladd was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Beecham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Sheila Warnock SEUS, Appellant, v. JOHN NUVEEN & CO., INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Local No. 1710, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Licata v. GGNSC Malden Dexter LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Monticello Insurance v. DionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Aziken v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Champion v. ChampionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Bank of America, N.A. v. BarrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API