Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Seidman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1911Published

Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Mendal Goldberg against Jacob Seidrnan. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff made to the order of the defendant an accommodation three month’s note for $200 upon defendant’s promise to pay the note- at maturity; that defendant negotiated the note; that the plaintiff was compelled to and did pay the same to its holder, a trust company; and that defendant had repaid the plaintiff only $15.

The record is unsatisfactory, in that the objections made by counsel from time to time are not stated with convincing clearness or precision. There appear to have been a number of errors made in respect of the admission and exclusion of evidence,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keller v. MortonNew York Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API