Legal Opinion
Coppola v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 12, 2013No. Case No. 1:11-CV-1257 AWI BAMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
This is an environmental law case that arises from the chemical contamination of property surrounding a dry cleaning business. Plaintiffs (collectively “Coppola”) have brought suit against inter alia the California Water Service Company (“Cal Water”) and Martin and Martin Properties (“Martin”). The Court previously dismissed the third amended complaint under Rule 12(b)(6). The active complaint is the Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Additionally, Martin has filed a counterclaim…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Crane v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Cross v. California Department of Food and AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Estate of Vincent Frank Boscaino, Jr. v. Adventist Health HanfordDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Hellenic Petroleum LLC v. Sacramento Energy Resources, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.