Legal Opinion

Harries v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 30, 1997PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

In this capital case, appellant, Ronald Richard Harries, appeals as of right the denial by the Sullivan County Criminal Court of his second petition for post-conviction relief. He argues that the trial court erred in finding that the jury’s application of the felony-murder aggravating circumstance in violation of the rule announced in State v. Middlebrooks, 840 S.W.2d 317 (Tenn.1992), was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. In that respect, he also contends the trial court erred by concluding that evidence of his alcohol and drug intoxication at the time of the offense…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Goad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. King v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Taylor v. MyersDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
  4. Coy Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  5. Franklin Scott Keith v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API