King v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLDER, J.
In this post-conviction capital case, we granted this appeal to determine whether the jury’s reliance on an invalid felony murder aggravating circumstance was harmless error. Upon review, we hold that the jury’s consideration of the invalid felony murder aggravating circumstance was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt due to the strength of the remaining valid aggravating circumstances and the relative weakness or absence of any mitigating circumstances. The Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the post-conviction petition is affirmed.
BAC…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. CazesTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MiddlebrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SimsTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Davis v. the TennesseanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Tommy King v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- King v. BellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.