Norman Katz v. Herbert Feinberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Norman Katz appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Charles S. Haight, Judge) vacating, pursuant to Section 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1, et al, a finding in his favor made by an arbitration panel against his former business partner Herbert Feinberg. Because this Court agrees with the district court’s determinations that neither the arbitrability of the valuation provision of the parties’ Purchase Agreement nor the valuation provision itself was subject to arbitration, we affirm the district court’s vacatur.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Michael J. Bybyk and Joyce O. BybykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In re the Arbitration between Dimson & ElghanayanNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Katz v. FeinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Blue Tee Corp. v. Koehring Company and United Dominion Industries, Inc., (Formerly Known as Amca International Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Jock v. Sterling Jewelers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. v. UBS Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- DDK Hotels, LLC v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Hoeft v. MVL Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.