Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Dimson & Elghanayan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 1967PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeating, J.
Petitioners Dimson, Berg and Feldman have applied for an order restraining arbitration attempted by Ataollah Elghanayan. Special Term denied the application. The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed by a divided court.
The facts are somewhat complicated. For the sake of simplicity, the petitioners will be referred to as the “ BDF ” group. Respondent Ataollah Elghanayan and his two brothers, Nourollah and Aghadjan, will be referred to as the “ E ” group.
The BDF group, together with the E group (and in some instances with others), owned interests in eight separate enterprises involving…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pearl Street Development Corp. v. Conduit & Foundation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Norman Katz v. Herbert FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- In re the Arbitration between Penn Central Corp. & Consolidated Rail Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- New York Overnight Partners, L.P. v. GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Katz v. FeinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.