Legal Opinion

Roe v. Austin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 29, 2018No. 2 CA-CV 2017-0194PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARING, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Valer Clark (formerly Valer Austin), on behalf of herself and the entities she owns and controls, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial, in which the trial court awarded Dan and Myriam Roe a life estate in a house and surrounding property and concluded that the divorce settlement agreement ("Settlement") entered between Valer and Josiah Austin did not require Josiah to defend and indemnify Valer against the Roes' life estate claim. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment awarding a life estate to the Roes, as well as the judgment that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Goodman v. Newzona Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. U.S. Insulation, Inc. v. Hilro Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Cogan v. Arnaldo TrabuccoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. Bufford v. VXI Global Solutions LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  3. C21FC LLC v. NYC Vision Capital IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  4. Delta Zee Solutions LLC v. Britannia Tucson LLC, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  5. Evans v. Scribe One Limited LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API