Legal Opinion
Melcer v. ZUCK
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 2, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 N.J. Super. 252 (1967)
230 A.2d 538
CHAIM MELCER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BENJAMIN ZUCK, ROSE ZUCK AND R.G.B. CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided June 2, 1967.
Mr. Thomas J. Smith, Jr., for plaintiff (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys).
Mr. Julius Braun for defendants Benjamin Zuck and Rose Zuck.
LANE, J.S.C.
This action was instituted for specific performance of an agreement to sell real estate, to set aside a subsequent conveyance of the real property and, in the alternative, for damages for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Untermann v. UntermannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Highway Holding Co. v. Yara Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Ganger v. MoffettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Colton v. DepewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Pius X House of Retreats v. CAMDEN DIOCESE NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Donovan v. BachstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Donovan v. BachstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- St. Pius X House of Retreats v. CAMDEN DIOCESE NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982