Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Stell
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1992No. D-2348PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
835 S.W.2d 100 (1992)
Belinda Moore ROGERS, Petitioner,
v.
Robert STELL and Mary Stell, Respondents.
No. D-2348.
Supreme Court of Texas.
July 1, 1992.
G. David Westfall, Dallas, for petitioner.
James Lee Williams, Dallas, for respondents.
2Per curiam
We hold that an undisclosed individual party witness may testify at trial where the party did not respond to or supplement her response to an interrogatory seeking persons expected to be called at trial, but properly identified herself as a person with knowledge of relevant facts.
After a traffic accident, Robert and Mary Stell sued Belinda Rogers for property damage…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Dallas Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Smith v. Southwest Feed YardsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Exocet Inc. v. CordesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Rogers v. StellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
4Cited by35 opinions
- Texas Department of Human Services v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Miller v. Kennedy & Minshew, Professional Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Steger v. Muenster Drilling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- A.G.E., Inc. v. Buford, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. Denton Central Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.