Henry Clay Fire Insurance v. Crider
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Caldwell Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Quin
Affirming.
A .silo locate^ two feet from a barn and structurally connected therewith is an “addition” within the meaning of a clause in a tornado policy reading:
*122“$500.00 on a frame, metal roofed barn and sheds, occupied as a cow barn, including- foundations and additions . . . ”
The judgment appealed from so held and with this conclusion we agree.
Appellee operates a dairy and creamery at Fredonia, in Caldwell comity. To the cow barn, a two-story structure, was attached a one-story shed ten or twelve feet high. The silo, eighteen feet in diameter and forty-five…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marsh v. Concord Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Cargill v. Millers' & Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Home Mutual Insurance Co. of California v. RoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Shepard v. Germania Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Stables v. Union Assurance SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leo Bros. Co. v. New Zealand Ins. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924