Legal Opinion

Henry Clay Fire Insurance v. Crider

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 25, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Caldwell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Quin

Affirming.

A .silo locate^ two feet from a barn and structurally connected therewith is an “addition” within the meaning of a clause in a tornado policy reading:

*122“$500.00 on a frame, metal roofed barn and sheds, occupied as a cow barn, including- foundations and additions . . . ”

The judgment appealed from so held and with this conclusion we agree.

Appellee operates a dairy and creamery at Fredonia, in Caldwell comity. To the cow barn, a two-story structure, was attached a one-story shed ten or twelve feet high. The silo, eighteen feet in diameter and forty-five…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Concord Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  2. Cargill v. Millers' & Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Home Mutual Insurance Co. of California v. RoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Shepard v. Germania Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Stables v. Union Assurance SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leo Bros. Co. v. New Zealand Ins. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API