Legal Opinion
Stables v. Union Assurance Society
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1909No. 7542PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, William Parmerlee, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered March 27, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the, merits before the court without a jury, in an action on a policy of fire insurance.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This action was brought by the respondent against the appellant, to recover on a fire insurance policy. There is no question as to the loss, nor the amount of the loss, the defense being that the property destroyed was *275not covered by the policy. The property insured was described in the policy as follows:
“$1500 on the two story frame building, and additions attached thereto, including electric lights, wiring, plumbing and all permanent improvements, occupied as a livery, boarding and sales stable, situate on the southeast corner of Washington street and Fourth Avenue, Seattle, Washington.”
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matthews v. . American Central Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- North British & Mercantile Insurance v. TyeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Liebenstein v. Ætna InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stusser v. Mutual Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Ideal Pump & Manufacturing Co. v. American Central InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Mountain Timber Co. v. Lumber InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Pearl Assur. Co., Limited v. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel County, Colo. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel County, Colo. v. Pearl Assur. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Old Colony Ins. Co. v. HardawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.