Legal Opinion

Leo Bros. Co. v. New Zealand Ins. Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCARTHY, C. J.

This is an action upon a fire insurance policy, by which appellant insured certain machinery in respondent’s vinegar factory, the covering clause being as follows:

“$3000.00 — On Fixed and Movable Machinery of every kind and description, all while contained in the three story brick and frame Building, situate at No. 244 on the East side of Main Street, between ‘A’ and £C’ Streets, in Moscow, Idaho.”

The covering clause has the following notation:

“Insurance Map

Sheet i

Block 102

No. 244”

The policy was written by Fred Veatch as agent for appellant. He was also manager and secretary of Leo Brothers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Still v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Henry Clay Fire Insurance v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc., Ltd. v. Leo Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leo Bros. v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API