Legal Opinion

Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Anderson

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 30, 2005No. 00080, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHollander, J.

In this case of first impression, we must determine whether a police department is entitled to judicial review of a “not guilty” finding rendered by a hearing board convened pursuant to the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (“LEOBR”), Md.Code (2003), Title 3, Subtitle 1 of the Public Safety Article (“P.S.”). 1 The appeal arises from an alleged unauthorized vehicular pursuit conducted by Kathleen Anderson, appellee, an officer with the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (the “Commission”), appellant.

As a result of Anderson’s conduct, appellant initiated disciplinary…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Mayor of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Schreyer v. ChaplainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Dixon v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Syed v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API