McNEIL
Board of Immigration Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #1523 Marrinr-orDioNzin In Deportation Proceedings A-10180570 Decided by Board November .1964 and Martha 17, 1965 Decided by Attorney General November 5, 1965 The taking by the Service of oral depositions from witnesses before the United States Consul in Calcutta, India, when respondent or his counsel was either unwilling or unable to be present but who thereafter had full opportunity to examine the depositions and to submit written cross-interrogatories, was not prejudicial to respondent; nor was there error because one of the witnesses when cross-examined was in Germany and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Raymond A. O'COnnOrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Chung Young Chew v. John P. Boyd, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice, Seattle DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Gastelum-Quinones v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- David Hyun v. Herman R. Landon, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Poole v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- CONLIFFEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1968
- LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
- Poole v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008