Legal Opinion

CONLIFFE

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1968No. 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1929 MATTER OF CONLIFFE In Deportation Proceedings A-13419457 Decided by Board December 3, 1968 (1) Evidence obtained during the preliminary investigation in the form of affidavits and question-and-answer statements are admissible in evidence in deportittion proceedings to establish respondent was not the legal spouse of a U.S. citizen at entry and, hence, is deportable under section 241(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as one not nonquota as specified in his visa and whose visa was procured by fraud or misrepre- sentation. (2) There was no denial of due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ah Chiu Pang v. Immigation and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. David Hyun v. Herman R. Landon, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Singh v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. McNEILBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeVERABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977
  2. PONCOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  3. VIVASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API