Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baumgartner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2003No. 2002-2237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Elsebeth M. Baumgartner of Oak Harbor, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0064583, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1995. In an amended complaint filed on March 1, 2002, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with professional misconduct, including allegations that she made numerous unfounded accusations of criminal and unethical activity against private individuals and public officials and also compromised her clients’ interests. Respondent answered, denying any misconduct, but admitting that she had accused various judges, prosecutors, law enforcement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BaumgartnerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BaumgartnerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BaumgartnerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. FrostOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. PullinsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hemphill v. DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API