Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gardner
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 13, 2003No. 2002-1461PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, Mark J. Gardner of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0061172, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in May 1993. On August 13, 2001, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a complaint charging respondent with several violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility, including DR 7-106(C)(6) (engaging in undignified or discourteous conduct which is degrading to a tribunal) and 8-102(B) (knowingly making a false accusation about a judge). A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline heard the matter and, based on stipulations and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. SlavinTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- In re CobbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- State v. DemastryOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Shimko v. LobeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.