Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Counsel v. Baumgartner
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 2002No. 02-65PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration of respondent’s appearance before the court on March 27, 2002,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondent is found not to be in contempt.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall not engage in the practice of law in any form until respondent is reinstated to the practice of law by order of this court.
Resnick, J., not participating.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BaumgartnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003