Legal Opinion
Paul v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 27, 1963No. Civ. No. 467PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LARKINS, District Judge.
SUMMARY
The above-entitled action was brought against the United States of America for the return of farm marketing quota penalties paid by plaintiff, in the amount of $5,866.05, which were imposed pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. §§ 1281-1407.
The plaintiff complains that the penalty was the result of a retroactive act; that he was entitled to notice of his violation of the regulations prior to the planting season or harvesting season in each year; and, that his constitutional rights have been violated. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Ethan Stangland, United States of America v. Max MunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- James Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Walter J. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- Rigby v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- John R. Donaldson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- S. B. Allen v. W. Lewis DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964