Matter of Fed. Tel. & Radio Corp.(corsi)
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentDye, J.
I dissent and vote for affirmance. By the decision about to be made herein, a majority of the court recognizes that the appellant has the unrestricted power to transfer its contribution rate credits to a person or party not meeting the statutory definition of a “qualified” employer and this in face of the clear consequence that such a transfer will not only be detrimental to the administration of the fund as a whole but will deprive other ‘ ‘ qualified ’ ’ employers of their inherent right to have the protection of as great a total amount of credits as possible. I am sure the Legislature…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Matter of Marburg v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.