Legal Opinion
R. E. Schanzer, Inc. v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided March 17, 1944No. 114PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Chief Judge.
In this case the Price Administrator dismissed the complainant’s protest as untimely filed and he has now moved to dismiss the complaint as not based upon the denial of a timely protest. It is agreed that the grounds of complainant’s protest arose more than 60 days after the issuance of the regulations against which it protested and that its protest was filed more than 60 days after the grounds of protest arose. The case thus squarely raises the question whether Section 203(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act1 authorized the filing of the protest under these…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. N. E. Rosenblum Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Philadelphia Coke Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Utah Junk Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Thomas Paper Stock Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- United States v. Pepper Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Capitol Foundry Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Charles R. Krimm Lumber Co. v. TurneyEmergency Court of Appeals · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.