Legal Opinion
Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided April 27, 1904No. 1,236PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
HALE, District Judge.
This suit in equity is for infringement of claims 4, 5, and 6 of letters patent No. 393,278, dated November 20, 1888, to Charles J. Van Depoele, for crossing or switch for overhead electric conductors; also for infringement of claims 1, 2, and 3 of letters patent No. 396,313, dated January 15, 1889, to the said Charles J. Van Depoele, for adjustable crossing and switch for overhead conductors.
Claims 4, 5, and 6 of patent No. 393,278 are as follows:
“(4) A crossing or switch for electric conductors, comprising arms connected with and radiating from a plate or surface in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lemley v. Dobson-Evans Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- General Electric Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1911
- Hewes v. GayDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1926
- Alvord v. Smith & Watson IronworksDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1914
- Kip-Armstrong Co. v. MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.