Legal Opinion

Alvord v. Smith & Watson Ironworks

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 27, 1914No. 6145PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by William C. Alvord, administrator, and Ethel W. Corbett, administratrix, of William H. Corbett, deceased, against the Smith & Watson Ironworks and Edward Turney. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, Disti ft £EP p*

Kj s S“ p . ' c j ^ £ n t-3 & “ ff 3 a> secured certain letters pi bered 807,109, upon a ho to be the original and fit illustrated by the follown of the invention claimed: ™ * % S' SÍ O rj o S. 3 ® 3 g-crq ° o Or c r* ft p Crq i-J O i — < ¡3 srcra O h re „ <5 O cel Q ' O) ffl (I Oo C ‘ 2 (5 n a * r-b CD H-* B. c** ^ to g. fj-$ " g B ¡3* > — 1 w a <-+■ ¡3 P Cn. o o sf p n a B n> P* 2 3 § s rt üí 3 w C-p* i

The drum arrangement is carried on a shaft, journaled in bearings at, the shaft being supplied with a gear C, which by other suitable gearing is connected with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. General Electric Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1911
  4. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904
  5. Hutchinson v. EverettUnited States Circuit Court · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lemley v. Dobson-Evans Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API