Legal Opinion
Pandit v. Lynch
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 26, 2016No. 15-1149PPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRON, Circuit Judge.
Kamina and Shaileshkumar Pandit (“the Pandits”) have petitioned this Court for review of the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) of the Pandits’ motion to re-open removal proceedings. As we conclude the BIA acted within its discretion, we deny the petition.
I
The Pandits are natives and citizens of India who have lived as nonpermanent residents of the United States for the past 21 years. They reside in Massachusetts with their 19-year-old daughter, Pooja, who is a United States citizen.
On November 2, 2009, the Department of Homeland Security began removal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MONREALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
- Reyes Mata v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- ANDAZOLABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
- Fesseha v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Mazariegos v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moreno v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Jimenez v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Henry Lockhart v. MTA Long Island RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Assaf v. Progressive Direct Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- GCU v. HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANKDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.