Legal Opinion

Francis v. Outlaw

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 11, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Soper, C. J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

The appellee in this case, Charles W. Outlaw, recovered a judgment in'the Superior Court of Baltimore City against his wife’s mother, Mrs. Laura V. Francis, the appellant, for alienation of his wife’s affections, and it. is from that judgment this appeal is taken.

The right of a husband to maintain an action against anyone who has wrongfully alienated the affections of his wife and deprived him of his conjugal rights, is' now well established by a long line of decisions starting at least so early as the case of Winsmore v. Greenbank, Willes Reports, 577, decided in 1745; Wolf v. Frank, 92 Md.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Baltimore Elevator Co. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Tucker v. TuckerMississippi Supreme Court · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Miller v. Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge No. 358Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  4. Kurdle v. BrookmeyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Thomas v. LangWashington Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API