Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Aldorisio
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
Decided October 28, 1943No. File No. 34204PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCullinan, J.
The plaintiff tenant has instituted this action against the defendant landlord, under the authority of section 205 (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (56 Stat. 23; U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, §901 et seq.). The litigation finds its source in alleged excess rentals paid by the plaintiff to the defendant for residential quarters in Milford, Connecticut, which town is concededly within a defense rental area established pursuant to the terms of the Act.
The Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 became effective on January 30, 1942. However, section 205(e) of this Act (U.S. Code, tit.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Lapinski v. CopacinoConnecticut Superior Court · 1943
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ward v. BochinoNew York Supreme Court · 1944