Legal Opinion
Ward v. Bochino
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1944PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCregg, J.
This is a motion made upon the minutes of the court to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. The grounds are that subdivision (e) of section 205 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 [U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 925, subd. (e)] is unconstitutional; that the penalties provided for in the Act are not cumulative; that the verdict is excessive and contrary .to the evidence and contrary to law.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, Morris B. Ward, against the defendant, Mary Bochino, to recover a penalty of $50 for each of thirty-one alleged separate violations of subdivision (e)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Sturgis v. . SpoffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Osborne v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lambur v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Gilbert v. ThierryDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945
- Everly v. ZeppDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
- State v. Strong Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- Ward v. BochinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.