Lapinski v. Copacino
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (56 Stat. 23; U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 901 et seq.) puts a ceiling on prices for certain commodities, and, within certain areas, on rents of dwellings and apartments. Section 205e of the Act (U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 925[e]) gives an overcharged person the right to bring an action for triple the amount by which the consideration exceeded the applicable maximum price, or $50, whichever is the greater, plus attorney's fees and costs. Under this section "Any suit or action .... may be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction."
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armstrong v. AldorisioPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1943
- Armstrong v. AldorisioConnecticut Superior Court · 1943