Legal Opinion

Lapinski v. Copacino

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 16, 1943No. File No. 7830PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (56 Stat. 23; U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 901 et seq.) puts a ceiling on prices for certain commodities, and, within certain areas, on rents of dwellings and apartments. Section 205e of the Act (U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 925[e]) gives an overcharged person the right to bring an action for triple the amount by which the consideration exceeded the applicable maximum price, or $50, whichever is the greater, plus attorney's fees and costs. Under this section "Any suit or action .... may be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction."

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  3. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  5. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. AldorisioPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1943
  2. Armstrong v. AldorisioConnecticut Superior Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API