Legal Opinion

United States v. Fina

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1975No. Crim. 75-442PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BECHTLE, District Judge.

On July 21, 1975, thirteen individuals were charged in a two-count indictment with operating and conspiring to operate an illegal gambling business, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955 and 18 U.S.C. § 371. Presently before the Court are the motions of the above-named individuals (“defendants”) to suppress wiretap evidence.

This Court, on May 21, 1974, pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U. S.C. §§ 2510-2520 (1970), authorized the interception of certain wire communications. In our view, the wiretap…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  2. United States v. DePalmaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. United States v. CarusoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  4. Calhoun v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. United States v. CostelloDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API