Legal Opinion

Bohannon v. Taylor

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, P. J.

This is a proceeding in error from the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga county, wherein that court rendered judgment for the plaintiff who brought a derivative stockholders’ suit for the benefit of the Peerless Corporation, a Virginia corporation, seeking thereby to acquire for the corporation certain stock or its equivalent, such stock having been appropriated by the plaintiff in error, although paid for with the property and assets of the corporation.

The pertinent facts are not seriously disputed by the parties.

The Peerless Corporation was and is a Virginia corporation. Prior to 1931, it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. SeltzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Bird Coal & Iron Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Du Pont v. Du PontCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
  4. Presidio Mining Co. v. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Thompson v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Wing Leasing, Inc. v. M & B Aviation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Nienaber v. KatzOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Genesis Respiratory Services, Inc. v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API