Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Holmes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 367PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, President Judge:

This appeal presents an issue important to the application of landlord-tenant law. Appellant Mrs. Holmes requests that Pennsylvania join the growing number of jurisdictions which have abolished the principle of caveat emptor (or caveat lessee) and applied the doctrine of implied warranty of habitability to landlord-tenant relationships.1 For the reasons stated below, we hold that caveat emptor is no longer applicable to residential leases and that an implied warranty of habitability will apply to all such leases.

Appellant has rented a residential dwelling in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Marini v. IrelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. Sarah B. Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Javins v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Fair v. NegleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Aponte v. Aungst (In Re Aponte)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Lau v. BautistaHawaii Supreme Court · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API