Legal Opinion

Baird v. American Medical Optics

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 15, 1998PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPollock, J.

This appeal presents two issues. The first is whether the statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, bars a patient’s claim for lack of informed consent against an ophthalmologist who implanted an intraocular lens in the patient’s eye, the hospital at which the implantation took place, and the manufacturer of the intraocu-lar lens. The second issue is whether federal law preempts the patient’s state-law claims against the manufacturer of the intrao-cular lens, American Medical Optics (“AMO”).

In November 1983, defendant, Dr. Frederick Newman, performed cataract surgery on plaintiff, Eleanor…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  3. Caravaggio v. D'AGOSTINISupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Andrew McCarrell v. Hoffman-La Roach, Inc.(076524)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  5. Edan Ben Elazar v. Macrietta Cleaners, Inc. (078079) (Union County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API