Legal Opinion

Stankova v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 2015No. 12-17575PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This fire insurance case arises under Arizona law and involves issues of causation. In the summer of 2011, a wildfire swept through a large swath of Northern Arizona, burning acres of vegetation. Approximately one month after the fire was put out, flooding and mudslides in the area destroyed Plaintiffs’ house. Plaintiffs’ homeowner’s policy covered damage directly caused by fire, and excluded damages caused by flooding or earth movement. The district court granted summary judgment for the insurer, concluding that damage caused by mudslides a month after a fire could not, as a matter of…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Devon Hughes Penny Hughes, and the Marital Community Composed Thereof Devon Hughes Construction, a Washington Sole-Proprietorship Phil's Painting, a Washington Sole-Proprietorship, Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Devon Hughes Penny Hughes, and the Marital Community Composed Thereof Devon Hughes Construction, a Washington Sole-Proprietorship Phil's Painting, a Washington Sole-ProprietorshipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Howell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Millar v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Throgs Neck Bagels, Inc. v. GA InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flint Farms LLC v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API