Legal Opinion
Hardiman v. Dover
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 7, 1971No. 6306PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
The principle issue in this case is whether the procedure followed by the planning board of the city of Dover in deciding to recommend the rezoning of a small parcel of land was unlawful. A subsidiary issue is whether the procedure followed by the planning board was otherwise irregular or prejudicial to the interests of the plaintiffs. The matter was heard by a Master, ( Frank B. Clancy, Esquire) who took a view and filed a detailed and comprehensive report. The master found and ruled that the rezoning was reasonable and the procedure used in adopting it was not unjust or unreasonable. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ridgewood Land Co., Inc. v. SimmonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- Herron v. NorthwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Bosse v. PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Doliner v. Town Clerk of MillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Plainfield v. HoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Alexander v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 17 OF THURSTON CTY.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- Carter v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Hawkins v. City of FayetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.