Legal Opinion

Blackmar v. Lichtenstein

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1978No. 77-1855PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, Senior District Judge.

Blackmar appeals from an order of the district court finding that his complaint as to all defendants failed to state a cause of action pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We hold that the district court, in dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, overlooked and failed to rule upon an issue of real party in interest, an issue that should have been considered prior to the merits and must be considered before further appeal.

The procedural facts underlying the case are critical, though not complex. Black-mar, on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. John Daniel v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Golub v. PPD Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. Blassie v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Troyer v. KarcagiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  2. Blackmar v. LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. Corbin v. BlankenburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Knox v. LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API