Legal Opinion
Troyer v. Karcagi
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 11, 1979No. 78 Civ. 1946 (RWS)PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Noah and Clara Troyer (“the Troyers”) seek in an Amended Complaint to recover alleged losses resulting from their investment in certain discretionary securities trading accounts. The defendants are one individual, Joseph Karcagi (“Karcagi”), and three brokerage houses, namely First Columbus Corporation (“First Columbus”), Jones & Co. (“Jones”), and Prescott, Ball & Turban (“Prescott”) (collectively the “company defendants”), with which Karcagi was associated.
The Troyers claim that defendants have violated Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In Re PXRE Group, Ltd., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.