Legal Opinion
In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 24, 2005No. 99-197 (TFHJMF)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me for the resolution of Chitwood & Harley’s Motion for Court Assistance in Allocating the Court’s Attorneys’ Fee Award Among Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Upon consideration of the motion, opposition, and the evidence introduced during two phases of an eviden-tiary hearing, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. Also ripe and ready for consideration are two additional motions. For the reasons stated herein, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is denied and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re High Sulfur Content Gasoline Products Liab.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Romero v. ITW Food Equipment Group LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Silvestri v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Beecroft v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.