Woodworth, County Clerk v. Town of Hennessey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action in mandamus by the. Town of Hennessey against George PI. Woodworth, County Clerk of -Kingfisher County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
January 14, 1903, the trustees of the town of Hennessey passed Ordinance No. 73, requiring thereby the construction of a sidewalk along and in front of certain lots in said town, including lots 20 and 21, in block 36, in Thompson’s Addition. The ordinance-required the sidewalk to b'e constructed of either brick, stone, or cement, and to be built within six months from the 1st day of January, 1903. Said ordinance further provided that, in the event the owners of the property failed to build the walk within the time specified, the board of trustees should levy a special…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Sarah v. ReadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Baker v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.